我国现行法律对配偶权尚无明确规定和完善的权利保护机制，因此当配偶权受到侵害，尤其是来自婚姻关系外的第三者的侵害时，受损配偶一方的利益难以得到相应的法律救济。因此，在立法中明确配偶权，规定对第三者侵害配偶权的责任追究机制有其重要的现实意义。
    

全文除前言和结束语外，共分三章。
    

前言指出，我国现行立法缺乏对配偶权的明确规定及其完善的保护机制，导致在第三者侵害配偶权的责任追究上缺乏统一的法律适用，并引发各种争论，从而不利于和谐婚姻关系的维护和受损配偶一方利益的填补。
    

正文共分三章。
    

第一章配偶人身利益的规制。本章首先对配偶权内涵进行界定，并通过对其特征、性质的阐述，分析配偶人身利益的法律规制价值；其次，通过衡量我国配偶人身利益保护的相关规定，提出由于法律对配偶利益规制的不明确及其救济途径的不完善，难以有效保护合法婚姻关系。我国如能在立法上对配偶权加以明确，完善其相关内容，并为利益受损的配偶一方提供一条可寻的救济、抚慰途径，将对衡平当事人利益和维护婚姻关系的稳定起到重要作用。
    

第二章第三者侵害配偶权责任的确立。首先，本章介绍侵权行为的概念及其特征，并对第三者行为的性质加以探讨，得出第三者行为是侵害配偶权之违法行为的结论。其次，在对学界是否惩处第三者的不同观点进行分析的基础上，通过对第三者侵害配偶权责任的国际立法实践的考察，表明通过立法惩治侵权第三者，为无过错配偶方提供可寻的救济途径有其积极意义。最后，从我国现状出发，阐述了确立第三者责任的必要性。
    

第三章第三者侵害配偶权损害赔偿责任的追究。本章在前两章的论述基础上，具体分析婚姻领域中第三者侵权损害赔偿责任的构成及其特点，并重点研究第三者侵害配偶权损害赔偿责任中的精神损害赔偿责任的确定问题。
    

结束语回顾写作思路，并坦陈本文缺憾。
    
     [英文摘要]：      
    At present there is no stipulation or rights protecting mechanism for the consortium in China. When the consortium is infringed, especially by third party, the spouse enjoying the consortium can’t relieve his or her right by the legal way. It’s necessary to stipulate the system of consortium in the legislation, as well as the mechanism of imposing upon the third party’s liability.
    Except for the preface and the conclusion, the article is divided into three parts.
    The preface points out the fact that due to the shortage of the stipulation on the consortium and its protection mechanism, the court can’t find suitable law for investigating the third party’s liability. There are also some disputes on this problem. All of these are not in favor of maintaining the harmonious marital relationship, and protecting the party whose interests were been infringed.
    Chapter One is on the regulation of the personal interests of the spouse. Firstly, the chapter introduces the connotation of the consortium. Setting forth the characteristics and the legal natures of the consortium, this part also analyzes the values of the legal regulation on the personal interests of the spouse. Secondly, based on the analysis of the current legislative stipulation on the aspect of personal interests of the spouse, this part clearly declares that the legitimate marital relationship can’t be effectively protected, for the ambiguous regulation on the spouse’s interests, and the shortage of the relieving methods. If the system of the consortium could be explicitly stipulated, the contents of this right could be perfected, and the applicable relieving methods was offered for the spouse whose interests had been infringed, the interests of the parties would be balanced, and the marital relations could maintain harmoniousness.
    Chapter Two focuses establishment of third party’s liability infringing the consortium. Firstly The chapter introduces the concept and characteristics of the tort and explores the nature of third party behavior. It draws a conclusion that such a behavior is a kind of consortium infringement. Then the author also introduces the different viewpoints on whether the third party should be punished or not by the researchers. By analyzing the contemporary situation of our country, the author concludes that it is definitely important to establish third party’s liability by the legal methods. At last the author states it is necessary to establish third party’s liability by legal means from the current situation.
    Chapter Three explores the investigation of third party’s liability infringing the consortium. In the foundation of the elaboration of the previous two chapters, the author analyzes the conception and characteristic of third party’s liability, and the constitution and its characteristic of the law on regulating the third party infringing the consortium in the marital relationship. At last, the article mainly focuses on the topic of the third party’s liability for metal injury damages.
    The conclusion reviews the structure of this article, and acknowledges some disappointments in the process of writing.